|
Seriously, though nice page. You have done a wonderful job of illustrating the hypothetical properties and philosophy of something that is untrue. Do you seriously believe in infinity? The fact that your page even deals with this is ridiculous, but you've done it well though, and i must praise your authoring skills. You may wish to look into developing a mathematical system of infinity if your so adamant, but otherwise, there are more than enough infinity pages on the internet to amaze general people with concepts that amazet them. Please let me know if you intend on doing any research or publishing any papers, bc i would like to read them. It would be good material to read.
Author: Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo, Esq. (jpaf64[ at ]yahoo.com)
Date: Jul 11, 2000REPLY: Does Ms. Sealand's Attitude Confirm The Effect of A Possible BBT Conspiracy?
Ms. Sealand's opinion reminds me of the old adage, "Out of sight, out of mind."
If Infinity, which I consider the most useful thought of all, did not exist then nothing could. First, let's examine this notion using basic logic. What is finite in size is finite in space and thus finite in time (if we accept the proven scientific facts of Conservation and General Relativity). Now then, we exist, everything surrounding us exists and so forth ad infinitum, because "absolute nothing" does not exist (even conceptually it is actually a something of sorts), and because nothing (i.e. anything or everything) could not possibly spring forth from such an "absolute nothing". Secondly, let's examine so-called science that favors FINITY over INFINITY. Supposedly, as too many superficial scientists (not at all a denial of all the serious, deep-minded scientists there are) have so readily concluded, the Big Bang Theory has been proven to be undeniable scientific fact. NONSENSE !!! BBT (short for Big Bang Theory) is still a theory and a pretty bad one at that. I will not wish to go into the details on this (for that there are some pretty good pages on the Internet available), but simply point out that there are some very serious reasons to opt for an Infinite Universe of Relatively Finite Sub-Universes, or even an Infinite Totality Universe. Among them are the issue of whether it is the Doppler or the Compton Effect which should be preferred in our observations of the stars (I'll take Compton Effect with pleasure), and the obvious violations of the given, known rules of Physics, especially comparing the (to me most absurd) idea of a Singularity so infinitely dense with the idea of Subatomic "Seas" in the midst of Atomic "Seas" occasionally changing one-another (by Seas interpret: vast expanses of space capable of being filled with innumerable galaxies).
In any case, INFINITY behumbles us to LOVE one another and to be non-violently opposed to HATE. I LOVE Ms. Sealand for being, but DISLIKE her way of seeing things.
Infinitely so,
Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo, Esq.
Scientific-Philosopher
Chief Proponent of Infinite Realism (aka the philosophy of INFINITISM > see my annotation hereabouts or by entering my name in Yahoo's main search engine).
Copyright© 2000 Principia Cybernetica -
Referencing this page
|
|
|
