Is a time for new theory of evolution?
By Geza Zake
Generally we can say that evolution is scientific idea when we would like express development from the beginning to the higher or complex form of existence. Many scientists believe that this standpoint based on abundance scientific arguments specific in paleontology where argument for evolution is biological fossil rest of the life. Taking evolution as an universal idea we can create question: if Universe evaluated from the big bang toward form of the Universe as science know it, to the Earth, and if Life evolve from protozoa to human being, then, what is with evolution of Man and mankind? Did the human being as a result of biological evolution evolve further, if evolve, where and to which direction? On this question some evolutionist think that traditional biological evolution stops and begin new social, which belongs only to the human being and mankind. For the thesis there are many arguments, because human being and mankind obviously change itself. It is enough just take 2000 years and we can clearly see changeable man and mankind. The changes what we can se are not obvious as fossil changes, as a fish change into reptile, or primate to the man, because these changes is cause by human being as an subject of evolution with their creation and work. However, if we observe the originated changes from standpoint of the man characteristic before 2000 years and today , we can easily see that man's characteristic is essentially changes. From the miserable man who was afraid of the thunder he changes themselves into mental and physic huge who already everything see and know and who operate not only with Earth force bat also with the star forces. Changes in the present time have such dynamics and characteristic which bring the traditional evolution theory to the point when the theory become questionnaire in front of the creative power of the human being. Expression is that scientific knowledge and power are brings human being to the position to be designer of the inter-universe life forms. I would like to stress two words: crates and evolve. Evolutionist must have question: what is happened with the evolution when a subject of evolution becomes the human being by human creation in Avery field of human activity? Of course, answer on these question we can't find out if we only read Darwin's theory of evolution, or any another theory because the modern word begin with mediation of the human products evolution. We have there thesis that the mankind change himself too the Superorganism in which every particular human being become the mankind cell with analogy as biological cell in ours organism. Did idea of the new biological Superorganism has scientific evolutionary sense?
From my point of view these idea has sense because we have to many arguments for these thesis. All arguments what we have instruct us indeed that these process built up the know macro organism begin what is named here Superorganism. In my book the four these macro organism have gave them PRELIMINARY name HOMOTERAS. HOMOTERAS is a subject of knew biology theory. Human being is end of the traditional evolutionary theory but a goal of the new theory is the NEW BEINIG, which is growing up as evolution of the mankind. Difference between macroorganism (Homoteras) and Superorganism is in definition of the Homoteras and Superorganism. The Homoteras is an inter-cosmic makroorganism who is in evolutionary maximum whit capability to renew itself. Mankind evaluates in this direction! These trends speak to us that the holder of knew theory would be knew science the science of the mankind. In too these know science everybody welcome especially from the scientist's community but they must to transform him from their narrow scientific aim to science philosophers the futurist. Subject of those scientist is consideration of the relation between human beings and the evolutionary grow up mankind, i.e. relation between human being and growing up the knew macro organism. Who will appear in the future?
Who is Homoteras?
Following the chapter Homoteras, I have written:
When we think or speak about the planetary life, the concept of mankind cannot be overlooked. What is mankind? Does mankind evolves, if yes, where and to what characteristics? Those are the key evolutionary questions related to the Life evolution! Scientific fact today is that between a grown-up man, made of some 60 billion cells and the first cell as the Origin cell stands identity, and from that fact the vice versa order, from the Origin cell to grown-up man, it would be logical too. Accordingly, the concept of Homoteras is nothing else but the logos of the Origin - the cell of the human being as the first cell to designate as of the grown up man when first cell as an Origin appears into the grown up man. Extrapolating that fact and logos on the macro level the human being become the cell of mankind which is evolving to the grownup mankind named as Homoteras when macro-human being appears as the Origin of Life. A sign of equality could be put between man mankind and Homteras. The only differences between man mankind and Homoteras are those of evolutionary levels.
The difference between the contemporary mankind and Homoteras mankind is merely in that that Homoteras is an independent inter cosmic macro being who can renew his own existence, i.e. its pole nature, as we renewing the human life and every particular biological being on Earth. However, Homoteras is clearly determined, as the IDEA of the inter-cosmic being with known characteristic because these are mankinds's character-istic. Consequently, it is not a certain metaphysical cosmic being or gases vertebrates, but a real and particular bring that assumes the figure mankind.
The logos of the Origin understand that the man and mankind's evolution is directed towards Homoteras.
Homoteras is a genuine philosophical concept and substance. Idea of ideas, and thus it is an intelligent sphere of the forthcoming philosophy of the Origin. Philosophy, philosophize about Homoteras in the some time philosophize about Man and mankind on the distance of his polar evolution from the Origin to the Origin. Introducing Homoteras as a philosophical subject, the eternal questions of meaning and purpose of man's existence on Earth, then the question of meaning and purpose of mankind's existents, its history, political, technical and technological development become clear. Get the answers unknown so far to man's intelligence. In the context of Homoteras there is the extension of religious Truths because by postulating Homoteras, a possible cosmic being is postulated too who creating himself creates his own intelligence.
Homoteras is an Intelligent Designer!
Homoters already pulsate, respires, and has his own circulatory system, nervous system and his own metabolism. He develops his senses and sensory organs and his energy. Man, mankind, Homoteras are level of inter-cosmic being evolution which is evolve towards the Intelligent Beings who created Life. As it is known, it is an immanent religious postulation, and from now an intellectual too.
I have been involved myself into philosophical and scientific questions related to the evolution of the human wisdom through mankind's history studying relevant historical information belonging to early civilizations: Egyptians, Mayas, the Chinese, Indians as well as modern civilization or contemporary science. As archeology is a science regarding the material rests of human work and human history, paleontology is a science regarding material evidences of the evolution of the biological beings, we have evolution science regarding the development of human wisdom. Studying development or evolution of the human wisdom I have found very many interesting notions regarding the evolutionary questions. All my investigations and notions I have put in the book THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE ORIGIN with three subtitles: Biological theory of the Universe, Universal formula and Universal quadrility of the religion, philosophy, science and art.
Mankind is not a scientific o philosophical evolutionary subject as animal's o plants are. Anthropology for their human evolution theory take arguments based on fossil rest founded as an existence in the past time, but we have arguments that mankind evaluated too? Science did not find rest of the past mankind and does not mean that science can not develop the theory of mankind evolution? Because science has not outside arguments that mankind evolves too, my suggestion is to see arguments inside our mankind which few of them I have mentioned. In that case we can find scientific arguments same as the anthropology arguments for the man evolution. Therefore the new theory of mankind evolution scientifically could be supported by particular scientific evolution facts such as evolution from the radio lamp to transistor, from the transistor to the mechanical chip, and from the mechanical chip to the biological chip. In the general sense science product as well as evolution of the scientific wisdom could support the new theory. If we have conclusion that humanity on the Earth is evaluated and did not stop with man appearance, in that case we must presume that the mankind evaluated in some direction. In that case only right question is where? The science has no answer till now, philosophy has no too, theology has no idea, and instead of if we seriously do not think that evolution is directed toward the God. In these situation possible scientific supposition should be that human evolution is directed toward being who create us. This supposition based on biological fact that every particular biological being on Earth has these principle, i.e. that each biological being developed himself from his origin to the knew origin. This principle we can find out as the scientifically and philosophically low such is: each particular biological beings with their development or evolution come to condition when could renew itself. Why that low is not valid for the mankind? Why we did not say that mankind evolve to the condition when could be possible to renew itself? What prevent as to think like that? The science, philosophy, theology or our ignorance to know what will happen with mankind in the future? What will happen with mankind next 100,200,500 or 1.000 years with consideration that these question belong to the nonscientific guesswork or futurology?
Besides on my investigations of the wisdom of the earlier civilizations as well as wisdom of the contemporary mankind and science I have find anticipation that mankind future should be seam as ours personal future. That means that mankind evolve toward his Origin as each particular biological being evolve toward its Origin, not to back, as we can read Taking Life back its Origin . Scientifically and philosophically is much better to say
Taking Life toward its Origin .
If the science du not wont say something about possibilities that Life evolve toward its Origin they should say something about evolution of our mankind and about probability that mankand evolve toward makroorganism named Homoteras. If it is probable what is degree of probability? I think that probability is very high, high as probability that Marry and Harry will evolve from their first cell to condition to be ready renew itself by sexual or polar procedure, or by scientific procedure.
The scientist in to community of creators have specific role because they are in the some time movable and creation power for to built humanity structure and characteristic of the mankind. The key idea is that man and mankind become the subject and object for further progressive evolution to direction to creation and form the macro being same as create Earth life ambience as well as Life on the Earth.
Geza Zake
